Validatie van Medicare-maat voor potentieel vermijdbare ziekenhuisbezoeken na chemotherapie
Klinische validatie van de Medicare-kwaliteitsmaat voor potentieel vermijdbare ziekenhuisbezoeken na chemotherapie.
Abstract (original)
BACKGROUND: Medicare's OP-35 measure tracks unplanned hospital visits within 30 days of chemotherapy and defines a subset as "potentially avoidable" using ∼300 diagnosis codes. Despite widespread adoption in policy and oncology quality reporting, the measure has not been validated with clinician review. METHODS: We identified 14,220 acute hospital visits within 30 days of chemotherapy (2016 to 2023) from 22 hospitals in three health systems (academic, safety-net, community). A 5% stratified random sample of 705 visits underwent blinded review by three clinicians, who adjudicated avoidability and assigned a clinical classification for each visit (eg non-emergent care occurring overnight; non-urgent blood product transfusion; uncontrolled symptoms requiring hospital care). The gold standard definition for an avoidable visit was based on a majority of the clinicians. We assessed the diagnostic characteristics of OP-35 using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under receiver operator curve (AUROC). We used the clinical classifications to develop a new set of Actionable Categories of avoidability and assessed its diagnostic characteristics. RESULTS: Clinicians judged 30.2% of visits (213/705) as avoidable. OP-35 classified a similar proportion (30.8%, 217/705), but agreement was low. Sensitivity of OP-35 was 34.7% (95% CI, 28.2 to 41.6), specificity 70.9% (95% CI, 66.7 to 74.8), and accuracy 59.9% (95% CI, 56.2 to 63.6), with AUROC of 0.53. The Actionable Categories classification performed better: sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 85.2%, accuracy 86.5%, AUROC 0.87. CONCLUSION: OP-35 showed poor agreement with clinicians for avoidable hospital visits, raising concerns about its clinical validity. An alternative classification system grouping visits into actionable clinical scenarios offered superior diagnostic accuracy.
Dit artikel is een samenvatting van een publicatie in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Voor het volledige artikel, alle details en referenties verwijzen wij u naar de oorspronkelijke bron.
Lees het volledige artikelDOI: 10.1093/jnci/djag081